Discussion:
M,I.5,Perse cution ' bugg ing a nd counter-surveil lance
Add Reply
f***@yahoo.com
2008-01-01 08:52:29 UTC
Antworten
Permalink
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ?. I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place. from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know if. anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I. would call in one of those bug detection teams which
PO: >have those machines. that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We went to. a competent, professional detective
agency in London, paid them over. 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over 1. GHz and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range, they also checked the. phones and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they. wouldn't find
anything, would. they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact,. no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've done. this sort of thing to other people in more
"serious" cases, where they would know the targets would. suspect the
presence of. electronic surveillance. So they will have developed techniques
and devices. which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques. might be, I couldn't guess.

In. this case, the existence of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in". with what was said by the boy on the
coach. It was almost. as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail to detect the. bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other things. I would have to say relating to the
harassment.

I did all the things someone in my situation would. do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to calling in. professional help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual. inspection of electrical
equipment, plus any points where. audio or video surveillance devices might
have been concealed.. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require. visible supporting
circuitry.. It seems to me the best place to put a small video surveillance
device would be additional to a. piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically. break in to a property to fit
such. a device.

2742
news.nntp4.net autoreflector
2025-03-06 08:56:19 UTC
Antworten
Permalink
Hello,
this is an automatic reflector response to your message in the following newsgroups:

bln.misc,bln.net.statistik,bln.politik.rassismus,bln.test,boulder.general

Your message was received on the NNTP4.net news servers in Limburg (Germany):

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:52:29 +0000 (UTC)

The message took the following path:

news.nntp4.net!lim1.tschaffert.com!not-for-mail

If you are currently testing the functionality of your newsreader, congratulations – it seems to be working!

No email is sent to the provided address. The reply is posted in the respective newsgroups.

Automatic replies are sent to anybody posting into a group ending with
the word ".test". If you don't want to receive these messages, include
the words 'ignore' at the top of your articles or in the Subject header.

For obvious reasons, mails to noreply.nntp4.net are directed
into /dev/null. If you feel to write us, send your mail to
newsmaster [at] nntp4.net instead.

===========================================================
https://www.NNTP4.net
*Let's make the usenet great again!*

Host: news.nntp4.net (lim1)
Time: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 09:56:19 +0100
===========================================================


Full headers plus the first 10 lines of your original message were:

| Path: news.nntp4.net!lim1.tschaffert.com!not-for-mail
| From: ***@yahoo.com
| Newsgroups: bln.misc,bln.net.statistik,bln.politik.rassismus,bln.test,boulder.general
| Subject: M,I.5,Perse cution ' bugg ing a nd counter-surveil lance
| Followup-To: bln.misc,bln.net.statistik,bln.politik.rassismus,bln.test,boulder.general,uk.misc
| Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
| Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
| Lines: 46
| Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
| Xref: news.nntp4.net bln.misc:974 bln.net.statistik:1 bln.politik.rassismus:630 bln.test:1070 boulder.general:1
|
| -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| -= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -=
| -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
| PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ?. I mean if
| PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place. from top to bottom,
| PO: >I mean I live there I would know if. anything was out of place. If I was
| PO: >really suspicious, I. would call in one of those bug detection teams which
| PO: >have those machines. that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
| PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on
--
NNTP4 Reply v2.0.1b 02-10-2025
Based on autoresponder.pl by Elmar K. Bins and Ivo Gandolfo
Loading...